P2W Compliance — Q3 2026 Ban Rate Analysis

Q3 is the main analysis. Q1–Q2 are used to track recurring high-impact clients and stable low-impact benchmarks. All client impact values are shown as percentages.
Data caveat — Toon Space, Q2: Q2 note for Toon Space: the clean/low Q2 result should not be interpreted as an absence of issues. There were material account problems during the quarter, but the account was recovered/reacquired from Meta, so the final dashboard ban-rate view does not fully reflect the operational risk seen in Q2.
Client tracker
Type a client name to see its Q1 → Q2 → Q3 situation.
Select a client to view the quarterly trend.
Q3 contributors to company ban rate — Top 20
ClientImpact on company BRShare of problemDisabled spendOwn BRTotal spendDisabled accts
Top 20 Q3 impact
Impact = client disabled spend ÷ total company spend in Q3.
Historical sinners — Top 20
Ranked primarily by the highest company-level impact seen in Q1–Q3. Own ban rate is secondary context.
ClientQ1 impactQ1 total spendQ1 disabled spendQ2 impactQ2 total spendQ2 disabled spendQ3 impactQ3 total spendQ3 disabled spendQ3 own BRPattern
Historical saints / benchmark clients — Top 20
Benchmarks favor material spend with low ban rate. Thresholds are adjustable, but only the Top 20 are displayed.
ClientGood quartersQ1 total spendQ1 disabled spendQ1 BRQ1 impactQ2 total spendQ2 disabled spendQ2 BRQ2 impactQ3 total spendQ3 disabled spendQ3 BRQ3 impactBenchmark signal
Provider ban rate trend — 2026
Q3 provider impact
ProviderQ3 ban rateDisabled spendShare of Q3 problemQuarter spend